QR vs PDF417 vs Aztec vs Code 128

Apple Wallet renders exactly four barcode formats, and picking the right one is the difference between a beep and an awkward “let me type it in.” Here's each format's personality, and the one-line rule for choosing.

The four, and where you've met them

The one-line rule

Match the original; when there's no original, use QR. Scanning systems are built to expect a specific symbology — a rail gate wants its Aztec, a supermarket wants its stripes. When you're recreating an existing card or ticket, keep its format (WalletKit's scanner shows you what it read). When you're creating something new that you control, QR is the universal answer.

The EAN/UPC wrinkle

Many plastic loyalty cards carry EAN-13 or UPC codes — formats Wallet doesn't render. WalletKit's camera reads them fine (it scans 10 formats), and the fix is to carry the same digits in Code 128, which retail scanners read just as happily. Belt-and-suspenders: put the number in a visible pass field too, so a human can type it if a scanner sulks.

Practical scanner wisdom

Test once, trust forever: after creating a pass, scan it with any free QR/barcode reader app. If your phone reads it, the register will. Thirty seconds now, zero checkout-line drama later.

WalletKit app icon

All four formats, one editor

Scan 10 formats in, generate the right one out. Free to try on iPhone & iPad.

Download on the App Store

FAQ

My original card has an EAN or UPC barcode — what format should the pass use?

Code 128 with the same digits; visible number field as backup.

Why won't some laser scanners read my phone screen?

Old laser wands struggle with screens generally — max brightness helps; camera scanners don't care.

Which format holds the most data?

Aztec, then QR — both thousands of characters; plenty for any card number.